Careers

Diversity, Equity & Inclusion

Experience

Innovation

Interactive Maps

Locations

About

Pages

Meet our team of innovators
Ask us how we do it

Professionals

Insights

Services

Thompson Hine LLP, a full-service business law firm with approximately 400 lawyers in 8 offices, was ranked number 1 in the category “Most innovative North American law firms: New working models” by The Financial Times and was 1 of 7 firms shortlisted for The American Lawyer’s inaugural Legal Services Innovation Award. The firm has been recognized by the National Law Journal as a Legal Technology Trailblazer and featured by Bloomberg for its innovative service delivery models, which drive accuracy and predictability. The firm’s commitment to innovation is embodied in Thompson Hine SmartPaTHTM – a smarter way to work – predictable, efficient and aligned with client goals. For more information, please visit ThompsonHine.com and ThompsonHine.com/SmartPaTH.

Home | Thompson Hine LLP

Atlanta

Chicago

Cincinnati

Cleveland

Columbus

Dayton

Los Angeles

New York

Washington, D.C.

core/separator

core/heading

core/list

On Friday, December 8, 2023, the European Union reached a provisional agreement on legislation relating to artificial intelligence (AI), including generative AI, under the Artificial Intelligence Act (the EU AI Act). While this is a critical step in the EU AI Act becoming law, additional work, including finalizing the technical details of the new regulation, will continue. Once finalized, the entire text will need to be confirmed by the EU legislative bodies and formally adopted as law. Companies will then have two years to comply after it is entered into force (with some exceptions for specific provisions).

contentpilot/introduction

The EU AI Act is the first legislation of its kind, attempting to strike a balance between allowing innovation and mitigating risks posed by the new technology. The EU AI Act takes a risk-based approach: the higher the risk, the stricter the proposed rules. Summarized here are some of the changes agreed upon in the compromise proposal and the text provisionally approved last week.

core/paragraph

The definition of AI is narrowed in the compromise proposal to mean “systems developed through machine learning approaches and logic- and knowledge-based approaches.”&nbsp; (Article 3(1).) This narrower definition aims to distinguish AI from more traditional software systems. The compromise text then provides requirements and obligations relating to the use of AI technology, or completely prohibits some uses, based on the risk presented by the AI system.

The compromise text broadened some prohibitions of using AI and narrowed others. In the approved text, the following uses of AI are prohibited under the EU AI Act (Title II, Article 5):

The EU AI Act intends to provide regulation regarding AI systems that pose a risk of harm to the health and safety of individuals or that pose a risk of adverse impact on fundamental rights. The compromise text removed some of the high-risk use cases, added two new ones, and fine-tuned others. In the compromise text, the following uses and practices using AI technology are considered high-risk under the EU AI Act (Title III (and Annexes II and III)) and require varying levels of requirements and obligations for a technology to gain access to the EU market.

If you are using or developing a high-risk AI system, the compromise text has clarified and adjusted the requirements and responsibilities of various actors within the AI ecosystem (Chapter 2, Articles 8-15). These requirements provide detailed obligations surrounding:

The EU AI Act will further provide specific guidance to providers of high-risk AI systems beyond those listed above, including quality management and record-keeping requirements, and then break down responsibilities throughout the AI supply chain, with requirements and obligations on importers, distributors, and users of high-risk AI systems. The Act further imposes additional transparency obligations for certain AI systems, including a requirement to inform users if the AI system includes capabilities of identifying or inferring emotions, psychological states, or intentions of the user.

The compromise text adds a new section to the EU AI Act regarding general-purpose AI that has uses not considered prohibited or high risk. Under the compromise text, the law will take into account that a general-purpose AI system could be used as high-risk or as a component of high-risk AI systems, and an additional implementing act will address the specific requirements the general-purpose AI will need to follow based on further consultation and detailed impact assessments that take into account the specific characteristics of the AI systems under consideration. For other general-purpose AI systems, the compromise text notates the sections of the provider obligations that are relevant for compliance purposes (including conformity assessment procedures, registration obligations, appointing an authorized representative, and post-market monitoring proportion to the risks of the AI system).

With the proliferation of AI tools such as ChatGPT, the recent negotiations included significant discussions of how large language models that can generate new content (generative AI), also called foundation models, will be regulated under the Act. In the compromise text, specific rules have been agreed upon relating to these foundation models similar to those for high-risk AI uses, including technical documentation requirements, transparency obligations, including summaries of copyrighted material included in training data, and disclosure requirements where foundational models have been used in creating content.

Governance Over the EU AI Act and Penalties for Violations

The EU AI Act will establish an AI Office, advised by a panel of independent experts, to advise on developing methodologies for evaluating AI systems’ foundation models and possible related risks, as well as a European Artificial Intelligence Board to advise on and assist consistent and effective application of the EU AI Act. The EU AI Act also contains fines for violations set as a percentage of the offending company’s worldwide annual turnover for the preceding financial year: the greater of up to €35 million or 7% for violations of the prohibited AI applications; up to €15 million or 3% for violations of the AI Act’s obligations; and up to €7.5 million or 1.5% for the supply of incorrect, incomplete, or misleading information. These caps are reduced for small and medium enterprises, including startups.

While the details of the EU AI Act will be further refined and finalized, there are steps companies can begin taking now, depending on their relationship with AI.

All Companies with EU presence: Review and understand which AI use cases are prohibited and which AI use cases are considered high-risk and assess how they relate to the development and use of technology within your organization. Closely review the EU AI Act with an attorney to develop a compliance strategy.

Companies with EU presence that will use AI in high-risk use cases: Review the requirements found within the EU AI Act to understand the requirements and obligations that will apply to your use cases, and conduct a gap assessment of your practices for documenting current technology and evaluating new technology to identify where process changes might be needed.

Companies that develop AI technology: If you ultimately intend for your technology to be available within the EU, closely review the proposed regulation with an attorney to develop a compliance strategy.

All companies: The EU AI Act provides a framework for evaluating and assessing AI technology and offers a glimpse at the types of documentation, impact assessments, and record requirements that might come into play as other governing bodies begin to create their AI legislation. If you haven’t already done so, consider amending your internal policies to address and set guidelines surrounding the development and usage of AI technology within your company.

This advisory bulletin may be reproduced, in whole or in part, with the prior permission of Thompson Hine LLP and acknowledgment of its source and copyright. This publication is intended to inform clients about legal matters of current interest. It is not intended as legal advice. Readers should not act upon the information contained in it without professional counsel. This document may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.

https://admin.thompsonhine.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/European-Union-Reaches-Provisional-Agreement-on-AI-Legislation.pdf

European Union Reaches Provisional Agreement on AI Legislation

Services