Careers

Diversity, Equity & Inclusion

Experience

Innovation

Interactive Maps

Locations

About

Pages

Meet our team of innovators
Ask us how we do it

Professionals

Insights

Services

Thompson Hine LLP, a full-service business law firm with approximately 400 lawyers in 8 offices, was ranked number 1 in the category “Most innovative North American law firms: New working models” by The Financial Times and was 1 of 7 firms shortlisted for The American Lawyer’s inaugural Legal Services Innovation Award. The firm has been recognized by the National Law Journal as a Legal Technology Trailblazer and featured by Bloomberg for its innovative service delivery models, which drive accuracy and predictability. The firm’s commitment to innovation is embodied in Thompson Hine SmartPaTHTM – a smarter way to work – predictable, efficient and aligned with client goals. For more information, please visit ThompsonHine.com and ThompsonHine.com/SmartPaTH.

Home | Thompson Hine LLP

Atlanta

Chicago

Cincinnati

Cleveland

Columbus

Dayton

Los Angeles

New York

Washington, D.C.

On September 29, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed amendments to Form N-PX to enhance annual proxy vote reporting of mutual funds, exchange-traded funds and other registered management investment companies. In doing so, the SEC acknowledged that investors have an interest in how funds’ significant voting power can influence the actions of corporate issuers and impact the value of those issuers’ securities.

contentpilot/introduction

If adopted as proposed, the amendments would:

core/paragraph

core/list

core/heading

To make it easier for investors to identify how a fund or investment manager voted on matters, the proposed amendments would require the completion of Form N-PX using the same language as the issuer’s form of proxy. The SEC reasoned that using identical language would make it easier for investors to find and compare voting records. Reporting parties would also be required to classify their proxy votes into 17 standardized categories, including their sub-categories, so investors could easily find votes on issues that are most important to them.

The SEC further seeks to modify the scope of voting decisions that registered investment companies must report. Its proposal requires funds to include portfolio securities on loan among the securities with respect to which they are entitled to vote because funds may recall such loaned securities to exercise their voting power. The SEC’s proposal suggests that a decision not to recall loaned securities, and therefore a decision not to vote such securities, is just as significant to investors as how votes are cast.

The SEC proposes to expand the obligations for institutional investment managers to report their say-on-pay votes, resurrecting a 2010 proposal that was never finalized. Managers would be required to disclose their votes on the approval of executive compensation, the frequency of approval votes on executive compensation, and the approval of executive compensation related to an acquisition, merger, consolidation or other disposition of an issuer’s assets. Unlike the 2010 proposal, the current proposal would only require a manager to report on votes where it exercised a security’s voting power. The SEC clarified that if a manager’s say-on-pay vote was entirely determined by its client without the manager’s independent judgment, the manager would not have exercised voting power. However, if a manager chose not to vote a security, the decision to abstain would be an exercise of voting power.

The amendments would require reporting parties to identify the number of shares voted and how those shares were voted. Conversely, the amendments would also require reporting parties to identify the number of securities on loan that were not recalled and therefore not voted. The SEC commented that requiring the disclosure of unrecalled securities was consistent with the current requirement to report securities that were not voted.

The SEC’s proposal includes several amendments to improve the usability of Form N-PX, including standardizing the order of disclosures, changing the cover page and adding a summary page. Under the proposal, reporting parties would need to complete Form N-PX using a custom eXtensible Markup Language created specifically for the form. The amendments would also instruct reporting parties to disclose whether each vote was for or against management’s recommendation.

The SEC is accepting comments on the proposed amendments through December 14, 2021.

Andrew J. Davalla 614.469.3353 <a href="mailto:Andrew.Davalla@ThompsonHine.com">Andrew.Davalla@ThompsonHine.com</a>

Philip B. Sineneng 614.469.3217 <a href="mailto:Philip.Sineneng@ThompsonHine.com">Philip.Sineneng@ThompsonHine.com</a>

Krisztina Nadasdy 614.469.3243 <a href="mailto:Krisztina.Nadasdy@ThompsonHine.com">Krisztina.Nadasdy@ThompsonHine.com</a>

This advisory bulletin may be reproduced, in whole or in part, with the prior permission of Thompson Hine LLP and acknowledgment of its source and copyright. This publication is intended to inform clients about legal matters of current interest. It is not intended as legal advice. Readers should not act upon the information contained in it without professional counsel.

This document may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.

https://admin.thompsonhine.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Investment_Management_Update_-_SEC_Proposes_Enhanced_Proxy_Voting_Disclosures.pdf

SEC Proposes Enhanced Proxy Voting Disclosures

Services