Careers

Diversity, Equity & Inclusion

Experience

Innovation

Interactive Maps

Locations

About

Pages

Meet our team of innovators
Ask us how we do it

Professionals

Insights

Services

Thompson Hine LLP, a full-service business law firm with approximately 400 lawyers in 8 offices, was ranked number 1 in the category “Most innovative North American law firms: New working models” by The Financial Times and was 1 of 7 firms shortlisted for The American Lawyer’s inaugural Legal Services Innovation Award. The firm has been recognized by the National Law Journal as a Legal Technology Trailblazer and featured by Bloomberg for its innovative service delivery models, which drive accuracy and predictability. The firm’s commitment to innovation is embodied in Thompson Hine SmartPaTHTM – a smarter way to work – predictable, efficient and aligned with client goals. For more information, please visit ThompsonHine.com and ThompsonHine.com/SmartPaTH.

Home | Thompson Hine LLP

Atlanta

Chicago

Cincinnati

Cleveland

Columbus

Dayton

Los Angeles

New York

Washington, D.C.

We represent and assist our clients in bid protests at each available forum, as both protesters and as intervenors in defense of contract awards. The federal bid protest system includes the right to file a bid protest directly with federal agencies, as well as with the GAO, which saw nearly 2,800 cases filed in FY 2016, and the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, which receives about 120 bid protests each year.

contentpilot/introduction

When pursuing a bid protest, offerors are more likely to receive relief through corrective action (for example, an agency’s decision to re-evaluate a proposal, permit revised proposals or reinstate a proposal into a competitive range) than a sustained decision. According to GAO’s FY 2016 annual report, the “effectiveness rate” of bid protests at GAO was 46 percent, a figure that includes corrective action by agencies. Depending on the agency’s actions taken, the protester may or may not consider the ultimate outcome to be a victory – but a protest resulting in corrective action does give the protester a chance to have its arguments heard, and often, its proposal reconsidered by the agency.

core/paragraph

GAO’s annual report includes a summary of the most prevalent grounds for sustaining protests during the preceding year. During FY 2016, the most common reasons cited for sustained protests were unreasonable technical evaluations, unreasonable past performance evaluations, unreasonable cost or price evaluations, and flawed selection decisions. This illustrates that while GAO will not sustain a protest based on “mere disagreement” with an agency evaluation, it will fairly consider the protester’s arguments based on an unreasonably flawed evaluation or selection decision.

contentpilot/expand-more

GAO Bid Protest Filings Down in FY 2020; Effectiveness Rate Reaches Record High

Practices

Bid Protests